Page MenuHomePhabricator

Contribution counting error NehalDaveND
Closed, InvalidPublic

Event Timeline

NehalDaveND updated the task description. (Show Details)
NehalDaveND raised the priority of this task from to Needs Triage.
NehalDaveND assigned this task to TTO.
NehalDaveND added a subscriber: NehalDaveND.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptJun 15 2015, 9:01 AM
TTO removed TTO as the assignee of this task.Jun 15 2015, 9:46 AM
TTO edited projects, added XTools; removed Tool-Database-Queries.
TTO set Security to None.
TTO added a subscriber: TTO.

I have no knowledge of xtools, so I'm removing myself.

TTO removed a subscriber: TTO.Jun 15 2015, 9:46 AM

500

500

425

Total 1425

but here

http://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user=NehalDaveND&project=sa.wikipedia.org&toplimit=10

my contribution is 1009 only. Please

see....

@Aklapper can you help me for this ? @TTO I have no knowledge of xtools, so I'm removing myself. So @Aklapper can you guide me who can help me. Or how can I find a person who works in xtoos ? Thank you....

TTO edited subscribers, added: MusikAnimal, Cyberpower678; removed: TTO.Jun 24 2015, 8:22 AM

@Cyberpower678, @MusikAnimal Namste ! Can you guide me for this bug ? My June Month's 400 contributions are deleted or hidden somewhere. Thank you...

@Aklapper Sorry if you are disturbed but so long time went but no one helps me for this bug. @Cyberpower678, @MusikAnimal these guys may be busy. You can see those images which I sent. My 400 or more edits are missing. My humble request to you. Please help me. Thank you....

Persons who sometimes work on XTools are CC'ed plus there are talk pages available.

MusikAnimal added a comment.EditedJul 3 2015, 4:29 PM

Sorry @NehalDaveND, we are busy getting a new stable environment setup. Until then I don't think we have any immediate plans to debug or fix any non-critical issues with existing tools. A few things:
~ Most tools, including this one, fetch their data from the replication database. It is always a little bit behind the production database, so the data may not be the most up to date, but shouldn't be too far behind
~ Some tools take into account deleted contributions, others do not. I am unsure if that is playing a role here

That's about the best I've got for now. Sorry we could not be of more assistance! Just hang tight, soon we'll have more stable and reliable tools for your enjoyment :)

MusikAnimal closed this task as Declined.Jul 3 2015, 4:29 PM

I looked at this when I was first added and it appeared to just be a little lag between DBs. The results I got were much closer to on-wiki result only off by a very small amount I attributed to deleted edits.

@MusikAnimal "soon we'll have more stable and reliable tools for your enjoyment :)" this you told me. Thank you for that. But 400 is may small thing for you. Because you are great person and doing so many things in you activity. But in wikipedia everyone gives contribution for language. Contribution score inspires to work more and more. This kind of thing is discouraging me to work in wikipedia. You put this in Declined. how is it ? When some one doing contribution in wikipedia, his heart and feelings are involved in that wikipedia work. However, I am not asking you "when" But I am asking two question.

~ "In more stable reliable tool I can see my those 400 contribution ?"
~ "If some admin deleted my contribution can I know the reason for deletion ?"

Last thing I want to tell you that, small amount is not an issue. Intention for deletion is issue for me. I hope you are getting my point. If I wrote something bad please forgive me. I am not you enemy nor you mine. We are just discussing. Thank you Friend.

No problem... If it is in fact some sort of bug hopefully you'll see more
accurate data with the new tools, but I have a feeling it's related to the
replication database (beyond our control). Deleted contributions are simply
edits you made to pages that were later deleted. This could be because you
marked a page for speedy deletion, for instance... Having deleted edits is
normal and not by itself wrong.

Thank you for answering. What is the meaning of this ? "This could be because you
marked a page for speedy deletion, for instance... Having deleted edits is
normal and not by itself wrong."

I tell you in my words. You are saying I (NehalDaveND) marked some page for speedy deletion. and it is normal thing and deletion is not wrong.

I want to tell you that, How can I delete my 400 contributions ?

If possible for you, Please give me these question's answer.

~ "In more stable reliable tool I can see my those 400 contribution ?"
~ "If some admin deleted my contribution can I know the reason for deletion ?"

Thank you @MusikAnimal ...

MusikAnimal wrote "This could be because..." (emphasis by me) in order to provide potential reasons. As this non-critical request was declined due to time/priority constraints, these were just pointers if you wanted to investigate the problem yourself if you consider this problem very important.

~ "In more stable reliable tool I can see my those 400 contribution ?"

Maybe. It's impossible to tell how correct/buggy/performant code will be that is not (fully) written yet, plus this also has to do with server behavior.

~ "If some admin deleted my contribution can I know the reason for deletion ?"

You could yourself, by checking logs (or asking admins) on those wikis.

@Aklapper Thank you. I understand your point. Thank you All of you. if those 400 contributions will come than its okay if not came let it be.

@Aklapper, @MusikAnimal, @TTO, @Technical13, @Cyberpower678 It is easy for you to tell me You don't have control on Database. But some one is there who has control on database and he is deleting my contributions. I want to claim that Some Admin of Sa.wikipedia.org or related to Admin of sa.wikipedia.org is doing this kind of destructive work. Above you can see again my contributions are deleted. If you can't do this So please tell me who is the head or main person of Phabricator ? I want to talk to him/her.

This is ridiculous all persons are know everything who is doing this but know one taking action against that person. You don't have control on database, if you don't control on database who are doing work in phabricator, but some Admin or other person has that control and S/he deleting my contributions. If main Phabricator's person can't help me than who will ?

Nemo_bis changed the task status from Declined to Invalid.EditedJul 13 2015, 6:55 AM
Nemo_bis claimed this task.
Nemo_bis added a subscriber: Nemo_bis.

Your contributions are not being deleted or you wouldn't see them on wiki. If I look at https://sa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=1425&tagfilter=&title=Special:Contributions&contribs=user&target=NehalDaveND&namespace=&tagfilter=&year=2015&month=6&uselang=en I see that there are many "fake" revisions, i.e. actions which are shown in history and contributions but are not actual edits.

For instance, I count about a hundred moved pages, which can also be counted in the logs:

MariaDB [sawiki_p]> select count(*) from logging where log_user_text = 'NehalDaveND' and log_timestamp LIKE '201506%';
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|       84 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

The edit count in the tool corresponds to the database, so it's not a bug. Closing.

select count(*) from revision where rev_user_text = 'NehalDaveND' and rev_timestamp LIKE '201506%';+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|     1073 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.03 sec)
MusikAnimal moved this task from Inbox to Complete on the XTools board.Jul 23 2017, 7:47 PM