Maniphest T106176

Implement GadgetRepo class
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Assigned To

Authored By

	Legoktm
	Jul 17 2015, 7:42 PM

Tags

Referenced Files

None

Subscribers

MarkAHershberger

Description

The GadgetRepo class should be implemented in Gadgets 1.0 (master) to allow for a transition towards Gadgets 2.0.

Details

Related Changes in Gerrit:

	Subject	Repo	Branch	Lines +/-
	Add abstract GadgetRepo and MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition implementation	mediawiki/extensions/Gadgets	master	+342 -261

Customize query in gerrit

Related Objects
Search...

		Status	Subtype	Assigned	Task
		Invalid		None	T34169 Action to join scripts and styles in one file
		Open		None	T110014 Make gadgets easily customizable (merge Gadgets' branch "gadgetprefs" from GSoC 2011)
		Open		None	T31272 Implement Gadgets 2.0
		Resolved		Legoktm	T106176 Implement GadgetRepo class

Event Timeline

Legoktm created this task.Jul 17 2015, 7:42 PM

Legoktm raised the priority of this task from to Medium.

Legoktm updated the task description. (Show Details)

Legoktm added a project: MediaWiki-extensions-Gadgets.

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptJul 17 2015, 7:42 PM

Change 225659 had a related patch set uploaded (by Legoktm):
Add abstract GadgetRepo and MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition implementation

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/225659

gerritbot added a project: Patch-For-Review.Jul 18 2015, 10:41 PM

Change 225659 merged by jenkins-bot:
Add abstract GadgetRepo and MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition implementation

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/225659

Legoktm mentioned this in rMEXT5f3a82dca690: Updated mediawiki/extensions Project: mediawiki/extensions/Gadgets….Aug 3 2015, 11:43 PM

Legoktm mentioned this in rEGADe858bda3088d: Add abstract GadgetRepo and MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition implementation.Aug 3 2015, 11:51 PM

• Forrestbot added a project: WMF-deploy-2015-08-04_(1.26wmf17).Aug 4 2015, 12:00 AM

Legoktm closed this task as Resolved.Aug 4 2015, 12:10 AM

Legoktm claimed this task.

Where are the user-visible changes recorded? We're starting to get questions on the support desk.

This is not the correct task.