| kaldari | |
| Oct 17 2015, 12:09 AM |
| F2730557: Community_Wishlist_Survey.svg.png | |
| Oct 17 2015, 10:57 AM |
The basic graphic is mostly done: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Community_Wishlist_Survey.svg
It needs to have the text converted to actual text rather than outlines. Also the step labels should probably be bigger so that they are readable at thumbnail size.
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duplicate | Qgil | T125545 Phabricator Q&A session for Community Liaisons | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T116025 Goal: Align Community Liaison and Developer Relations project management practices | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T119387 Community Liaison and Developer Relation quarterly goals for January - March 2016 | |||
| Resolved | Chen_WMIL | T120828 Open registration for Wikimedia Hackathon 2016 | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T119703 Goal: Connect the priorities of the Community Wishlist and other tech priorities with the Wikimedia Hackathon 2016 | |||
| Resolved | kaldari | T114193 Administer 2015 Community Wishlist Survey (tracking) | |||
| Resolved | kaldari | T115769 Build Community Wishlist infographic and make it easily translatable |
Quick feedback on the graphic:
FYI, quick'n'dirty version that works better for my brain (which is not a neurotypical brain):
Some hints on making it easy to translate: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Translation_possible/Learn_more
It could happen that WMDE's TCB team is working on a request from the international wishlist, shouldn't it be mentioned on the infographic alike with other WMF Dev teams then? Similar to the prototype infographic we made to illustrate the technical wishes process some time ago - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMDE_Technical_Wishes_-_Collaboration_and_Communication.svg. What do you think, @kaldari, @DannyH? Cheers, B.
@Bmueller: Since I'm not really sure how to re-arrange the graphic to accommodate that, what do think about just changing "Other WMF developer teams" to "Other developer teams"?
@Aklapper: Good point about the labels. I've revised them to be more consistent with the existing process documentation.
Step ownership: Some steps seem to not explain who is supposed to perform these actions while others do - e.g. who is supposed to translate "the proposal" (I thought there will be several proposals?)?
Text updated to reflect who performs each action.
Direction: I appreciate arrows when processes are supposed to be one-way. The way is interrupted by a big "Community Tech team" circle and the way does not seem to continue towards the item "Completed wishes" at the bottom which I think is the actual goal in the end?
Personally, I don't find this confusing, so I think we'll stick with the design proposed by the designer rather than bikeshedding on it.
Curves: What is the design intention behind the curves? Imply "this is going to be a long way"?
Aesthetic I imagine. Same with the colors.