I don't want to increase arch-coms workload. So I don't think you need to monitor this. It is stuff like T117681: [RfC] Ordering of statement groups in ArticlePlaceholder where we need to figure out something within the team that doesn't really have an impact on the larger picture. At least that is the intention. For stuff that is relevant for the arch-com we tag those appropriately so it shows up on your radar.

Based on @Aklapper's last comment on T89865: Phabricator project page should not default to workboard, I suppose that we should disable the #rfc tag workboard. I don't have time to futz with this for now (or figure out if I even have permission), but that should be a given.

Still, we're still trying to more clearly establish the scope of ArchCom, and given my initial skim of the open issues in #rfc, I think I need to clear this up with a wider audience. I guess I'll plan to send mail to wikitech-l about this.

I agree, for "tags", there should be no boards. For a "project", there is an expectation that when I assign a task to a project, someone will see it in their inbox/board. Projects should have a workflow. Tags are merely markers for searching, so they shouldn't have a board. Having a board misleads people to think someone will look at it.

#rfc does not have a board ATM, should this task be closed then?