Page MenuHomePhabricator

Convert (confusing) #Triagers to #acl*Batch-Editors or similar
Open, Needs TriagePublic

Description

Convert (confusing) Triagers to #acl*Batch-Editors or similar

Event Timeline

Danny_B created this task.Feb 15 2016, 7:39 AM
Danny_B raised the priority of this task from to Needs Triage.
Danny_B updated the task description. (Show Details)
Danny_B added a project: Phabricator.
Danny_B added a subscriber: Danny_B.
Restricted Application added subscribers: StudiesWorld, Luke081515, scfc, Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptFeb 15 2016, 7:39 AM
Aklapper closed this task as Declined.Feb 15 2016, 8:34 AM
Aklapper claimed this task.

It's not restricting access to projects or tasks like #acl* does plus no reasons provided for the request, hence declining.

Krenair reopened this task as Open.Feb 15 2016, 11:13 AM
Krenair added a subscriber: Krenair.

It does get rights from application config though, right? So it should be an ACL project.

Right. Good point, thanks!
Current settings of Triagers:

I think this welcomes a review anyway (I personally do not have an idea why "WMF-NDA" should be a criterion).

I think some of those older ACL projects (project-creators, triagers) were just set up so some generic restricted-access-probably-trustworthy users could get some relatively low-level additional rights without having to do much else. Indeed it needs review.

Aklapper removed Aklapper as the assignee of this task.Feb 15 2016, 12:20 PM
mmodell added a subscriber: mmodell.Jun 3 2016, 9:21 PM

I've changed the policy to:

Restricted Application added a subscriber: TerraCodes. · View Herald TranscriptJun 3 2016, 9:21 PM

We can rename the project if others feel it should be an acl.

I've changed the policy to:

Policy is one thing, the other is factual rights of (members of) this group (i.e. the batch-edit).

We can rename the project if others feel it should be an acl.

That's pretty much what I proposed, however, answering my concern above before doing it would be great. Thanks.

acl*batch-editors seems reasonable. Not sure if that should be a subproject or Policy-Admins or Phabricator though.