Flow may be a possible alternative to a Facebook village pump. After finding a community (T130711), we can ask them to try Flow.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Declined | Trizek-WMF | T130712 Propose to a community which uses Facebook as a community hub to try Flow | |||
| Declined | None | T130711 Identify a community which uses Facebook as a community hub and understand why | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T137796 Help to define next steps concerning Flow development, based on the Flow Satisfaction Survey | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T125632 Plan, write and submit a satisfaction survey concerning Flow to communities | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T130730 Draft and review a public announcement concerning Flow support | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T141758 Improve the "Why not VE?" section of the Flow FAQ | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T144547 Create a distribution list for Flow satisfaction survey and distribute it | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T144730 Publication of the Flow Satisfaction Survey results including an analysis and raw data | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T145198 Flow satisfaction survey result: translate free forms |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
From JamesF announcement on Sep 6 about the Flow survey:
There are some areas in which Flow is currently weak for some use cases, and we don't advocate its active use by wikis which lack the expertise on how to use it. Because of this, we're not actively looking for further wikis to get the beta feature at this time, but if your wiki wants it, you can request it on this page.
As long as that is true, we are not going to propose Flow actively to a community. For this reasons, I would decline this task.