| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| labstore1004 dhcp typo | operations/puppet | production | +1 -1 | |
| labstore1004/1005 host entries for DHCP | operations/puppet | production | +14 -0 |
Details
Details
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | • Bstorm | T126083 overhaul labstore setup [tracking] | |||
| Resolved | RobH | T126089 new labstore hardware for eqiad | |||
| Unknown Object (Task) | |||||
| Resolved | • chasemp | T133397 eqiad: Rack and setup new labstore |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
My understanding is these are 2U servers and we have two :) I going to look at where is appropriate today if at all possible. Thanks chris
Comment Actions
talked w/ @Cmjohnson directly as he is in the midst of the Great Racking(tm). Row C is fine, different racks please. High-ish throughput needs between these two servers.
Comment Actions
- - receive in normally
- - rack
- - update racktables
- - label servers
- - cabling
- - setup bios/idrac/ilom
- - add mgmt dns entries for both asset tag and hostname
- - add production dns entries
- - setup network ports (description, enable, vlan)
- - update install_server module
- - install OS
Comment Actions
Change 286512 had a related patch set uploaded (by Rush):
labstore1004/1005 host entries for DHCP
Comment Actions
@Cmjohnson I can handle:
- update install_server module
- install OS
if you can finish racktables + label then assign this to me?
I want to run through some storage setups and benchmark performance a bit before I commit to something anyhow.