I can't speek Russian but if I look at symbols, I can see three agree votes and four oppose votes. I don't really think that we should deploy something that has only 42 % support.
If I'm not right, please add symbols to every vote so I can check the consensus. I also recommend moving votes into Voting section (preferable named in English so I can find it easily) for better checking. Thanks.
I think you can use Google to translate it. There are 10 support votes and 3 oppose votes for the extension.
And the main discussion about whether to use of links to those pages in the main namespace or not.
Sorry all for the spam caused by adding & removing this task from Wikimedia-site-requests. I was trying to get a list of wikis where this extension has been/is planned to be enabled, and I came up with this query, which suggested that the combination of Wikimedia-site-requests and ArticlePlaceholder was the right way to get this information. Please let me know if such a list is being maintained elsewhere.
We've made some progress by adding caching but I'd like to us to roll it out further on more small and medium size Wikipedias first before we go for Russian Wikipedia. I'm really sorry about this but the risk is still too high. It's really great that you want to have it.
@Lydia_Pintscher: Is/are there specific performance issue tasks that this ticket should be blocked on? (There should be, because otherwise there is no way for anyone to realize when fulfilling this task might ever become possible, and nobody can theoretically help fixing problems as problems are vague.)