Page MenuHomePhabricator

Report on Light Engagement survey pilot, round 1
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

  • Articulate our root questions (what was the purpose of the survey, what questions is it intended to answer?
    • Satisfaction of our customers
    • How to fine-tune our offering to be more valuabe? To be more appealing?
    • How to convert from survey results into answer to question survey was inteded to address
  • Results analyzed and documented
    • results examined
    • Results visualized if appropriate
    • obvious patterns, anomolies identified
    • Answers to purpose questions determined
  • Based on survey results, summarize new findings that aren't directly related to original questions
  • Conclusions drafted
    • What does this mean to TPG?
    • What is TPG thinking about changing as a result of this report?
  • Results published
    • TPG mailing list
    • WMF
    • mediawiki?

Event Timeline

JAufrecht renamed this task from Report on Light Engagement Survey to Report on Light Engagement Survey pilot.Jul 22 2016, 6:25 PM
JAufrecht renamed this task from Report on Light Engagement Survey pilot to Report on Light Engagement survey pilot.Jul 22 2016, 6:36 PM
ggellerman renamed this task from Report on Light Engagement survey pilot to Report on Light Engagement survey pilot, round 1.Aug 31 2016, 6:22 PM

@ggellerman: I think the "what we learned about the survey itself" should also be part of a "report on" task, rather than part of the "revise the survey" task. Do you think this task (T141136) should be expanded to include that other report, or should I create a new subtask of the epic specifically for that report?

@ksmith
I agree that "what we learned about the survey itself" should be part of the "report." I also think that it could be its own task so as not to complicate the 'assigned to" field.

ksmith moved this task from Needs Review to In Progress on the Team-Practices (This-Week) board.
ksmith added a subscriber: ggellerman.

I agreed to do a formatting pass (adding headings, dates, etc.)

I believe the formatting work is done. Passing back to @ggellerman for final review.