Follow-up to T140488
ErfgoedBot removes the root category [[Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kosovo]] to dispatch into the much less specific [[Category:Kosovo]]
Description
Description
Details
Details
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Add commonscat mapping for sq.wikipedia | labs/tools/heritage | master | +1 -0 |
Related Objects
Related Objects
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Why it is replacing ??
I think it would be ok only if added Category:Kosovo, but not to remove Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kosovo.
Comment Actions
ErfgoedBot job is to replace the generic, catch-all category like [[Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kosovo]] with more precise ones (for example, [[Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Prizren District]] or [[Category:Cathedral of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour (Prizren)]])
The process through which ErfgoedBot find this category is described at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database/Categorization
Comment Actions
So my guess is that ErfgoedBot falls back to case 5.2 − from [[Lista_e_Monumenteve_në_Kosovë]], going to [[Kategoria:Kosovë]], then to Wikidata [[Q7186363]], where it finds [[Category:Kosovo]].
This edit should avoid that in the future.
Comment Actions
I did a similar edit to the Albanian list. Might be worth ensuring that erfgoed both didn't move images in a similar way there.
Comment Actions
Change 303517 had a related patch set uploaded (by Lokal Profil):
Add commonscat mapping for sq.wikipedia
Comment Actions
I think I identified the issue.
It might be worth looking over which wikipedias we work on where we might be missing these connections (at least fa.wiki seems to be missing)
Comment Actions
Good catch. Sounds like the culprit!
I also did this https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?diff=362404132 to circumvent the issue, so we might not be able to validate behaviour with Kosovo ; would work for Albania though.
It might be worth looking over which wikipedias we work on where we might be missing these connections (at least fa.wiki seems to be missing)
Comment Actions
Sounds like a good reason to break out wikipedia_commonscat_templates and ignoreTemplates.
We could possibly add it as a new test for monuments_config that checks if any (wikipedia) language version mentioned there also exists in wikipedia_commonscat_templates? Or are there valid situations where this is not expected?
Comment Actions
Mentioned in SAL [2016-08-09T07:39:55Z] <Lokal_Profil> Deployed latest from Git, 768b3ac, 30e33ca, 8d7de41 (T141505)
Comment Actions
I also pushed this upstream (i.e. to pywikibot) via https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/303791