I'm re-prioritising this, and removing it from Helen's worklist, for two reasons:

• Firstly, no significant changes are expected in this area beyond the current roll-out of language links, which will be completed in the short-term. There is relatively little value in measuring these numbers just for the sake of them. We should measure them because we think they might change due to things we're doing. When we're not doing anything here, measuring them is just added burden (twice over — first for the work to measure them, second for the consequent proposals for additional work).
• Secondly, this area (links for readers between content) is the kind of area that is prime Reading responsibility. Though the work on ULS and in particular ULS's compact language links has been led expertly by the Editing department's Language team since before Reading existed, now that they do we should defer to them and their product management around changes in this area. This indeed can already be seen by the recent work of Reading Web to provide inter-language navigation tools on Mobile Web. As such, I think we should allow Reading Analysis to consider whether this work would be most beneficial to their department's work and if so execute it, rather than do it inside Editing.

Hope this is clear.