Hi folks - any thoughts on this? Thanks :)

I second placing the questions on Officewiki, once the first review is completed. It will make sense to also include the side information for the questions (Team goal, survey goal, question goal) for added context.

I think Officewiki makes sense, although perhaps we should use a Google doc instead because it provides a much better experience for commenting.

A couple suggestions on the logistics, to increase our chances of getting useful feedback:

• Get the whole proposal on a single page, or in a single Google doc. It's much easier to scroll through one page than it is to open 10 different ones.
• Send an email to wmf-all with a link to the proposal and a quick bulleted list of questions/issues that people are most likely to be interested in, so they can get a sense from the email alone whether they want to look through the whole survey.

Thanks @Neil_P._Quinn_WMF and @Kalliope - Yes - I was just thinking that I would collate collate the questions so they are by audience rather than by team - this would bring it down to 4 surveys. And yes - just in google docs - not going to deal with transferring into wiki mark up until the surveys are done and the questions needs to be archived/saved somewhere.

I will definitely be including all the goals and information use as well.

Any other folks have thoughts?

I agree with these steps - J

We will be posting submissions for staf review on this page: https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights/Proposal_submissions