Please add the language code nn-hognorsk to the list of language codes supported for monolingual text values.
This is just Nynorsk [nn] using an older standard. There is no need for a separate tag here, anything that would differ from Nynorsk can just be set as an alias.
@Esc3300 Where do you need to do that? As a native Norwegian I'm hard-pressed at thinking of any examples where that would be necessary.
No idea. Maybe the authors of articles at https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Prefiksindeks/Hn/ can provide you with a good explanation.
From a Wikidata point-of-view, the actual reasons are secondary, but I think we would want to identify the language variant of such pages.
No idea. Maybe the authors of articles at https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spesial:Prefiksindeks/Hn/ can provide you with a good explanation.
From a Wikidata point-of-view, the actual reasons are secondary, but I think we would want to identify the language variant of such pages.
Seems only @Ranveig is pingable, as that user was the author of Hn/Aorist.
I didn't write the article, I merely moved it from the main namespace as it's a non-standard form of Nynorsk. But what @jhsoby says above is correct. Høgnorsk is merely an archaic form of Nynorsk.
I would not say Høgnorsk is a variant of Nynorsk, they are both variants of Landsmål.
The older Landsmål evolved into Nynorsk, and a group insisted on continue using Landsmål, but renamed their variant Høgnorsk. They called Nynorsk for Flatmål, which can be taken as an insult in Norwegian, and claimed the names to be in accordance with Hochdeutsch and Plattdeutsch.
Not sure how this could be interpreted? You can't set an alias if there are no valid language tag for the entry, unless you use an otherwise wrong language tag.
I'm declining this for now based on the discussion here. If new good reasons are brought up to create it we can reopen this.
This is available for lexemes and therefore it makes sense for it to be available for monolingual text statements too (see T320889).
While it's probably not very useful on items, I think it would be useful for adding some usage example (P5831) statements on lexemes to illustrate the differences, along the lines of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_language#Examples.