Is it possible to include discussion about allocating official resources for OAuth development?

In T149551#2805970, @Niharika wrote:

Is it possible to include discussion about allocating official resources for OAuth development?

Would such a discussion be useful if no one with the power to actually affect resource distribution participates?
Vaguely related: T149635: [WikiDev17] Developer Wishlist (my other proposal which is more aimed at changing resource allocation)

In T149551#2825145, @Tgr wrote:

In T149551#2805970, @Niharika wrote:

Is it possible to include discussion about allocating official resources for OAuth development?

What about inviting whoever has such power to this session?

In T149551#2828851, @Qgil wrote:

What about inviting whoever has such power to this session?

Not sure who should that be, though - MediaWiki platform issues lack organizational representation. In the last year, the closest to official allocation was me working on it with @dr0ptp4kt's approval, so maybe he is interested.

Just noting that I saw the @ mention, and have added this as a discussion item for the next Reading Infrastructure weekly team meeting.

@Tgr Hey! As developer summit is less than four weeks from now, we are working on a plan to incorporate the ‘unconference sessions’ that have been proposed so far and would be generated on the spot. Thus, could you confirm if you plan to facilitate this session at the summit? Also, if your answer is 'YES,' I would like to encourage you to update/ arrange the task description fields to appear in the following format:

Session title
Main topic
Type of activity
Description Move ‘The Problem,' ‘Expected Outcome,' ‘Current status of the discussion’ and ‘Links’ to this section
Proposed by Your name linked to your MediaWiki URL, or profile elsewhere on the internet
Preferred group size
Any supplies that you would need to run the session e.g. post-its
Interested attendees (sign up below)

1. Add your name here

We will be reaching out to the summit participants next week asking them to express their interest in unconference sessions by signing up.

I do plan to facilitate.

To maintain the consistency, please consider referring to the template of the following task description: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T149564.

To the facilitator of this session: We have updated the unconference page with more instructions and faqs. Please review it in detail before the summit: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/Unconference. If there are any questions or confusions, please ask! If your session gets a spot on the schedule, we would like you to read the session guidelines in detail: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/Session_Guidelines. We would also then expect you to recruit Note-taker(s) 2(min) and 3 (max), Remote Moderator, and Advocate (optional) on the spot before the beginning of your session. Instructions about each role player's task are outlined in the guidelines. The physical version of the role cards will be available in all the session rooms! See you at the summit! :)

Note-taker(s) of this session: Follow the instructions here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/Session_Guidelines#NOTE-TAKER.28S.29 After the session, DO NOT FORGET to copy the relevant notes and summary into a new wiki page following the template here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/Your_Session and also link this from the All Session Notes page: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/All_Session_Notes. The EtherPad links are also now linked from the Schedule page (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Developer_Summit/2017/Schedule) for you!

The session was canceled due to scheduling conflicts. Slides are available but not terribly informative.