Page MenuHomePhabricator

Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Hello

We are asking for Autopatrolled user group to be enabled in etwiki. The group should contain just one user right, autopatrol. Members of Administrators user group should have the right to add users to the Autopatrolled group and to remove them from the group.

The change was discussed in etwiki (https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipeedia:%C3%9Cldine_arutelu#Uus_arutelu) and there is consensus for creating the group, with three users supporting and one user against the change.

Event Timeline

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald Transcript

Change 321879 abandoned by Urbanecm:
Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/321879

Change 321879 restored by Urbanecm:
Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/321879

Urbanecm triaged this task as Medium priority.Nov 16 2016, 2:31 PM
Urbanecm moved this task from Backlog to To deploy on the User-Urbanecm board.

Change 321879 merged by jenkins-bot:
Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/321879

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2016-11-16T14:40:15Z] <zfilipin@tin> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: SWAT: [[gerrit:321879|Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org (T150852)]] (duration: 00m 51s)

Change 321884 merged by jenkins-bot:
Fix autopatrolled for etwiki - 321879

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/321884

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2016-11-16T14:58:00Z] <zfilipin@tin> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: SWAT: [[gerrit:321884|Autopatrolled group for et.wikipedia.org (T150852)]] (duration: 00m 55s)

Urbanecm moved this task from To deploy to Done on the Wikimedia-Site-requests board.

It was deployed. If anything doesn't work, feel free to reopen!

You're welcome. Only a note, maybe you wish to create project page for the group...

Yep, creating the project page is in plan.

@Urbanecm
Would it be possible to create additional protection level based on the group? (I know it is technically possible, I'm asking the question w/ regard to the policy and server administration practices.)

Yes, it is possible. Give community comsensus, create new request and we'll do that. It was requested previously by other projects :).