Page MenuHomePhabricator

[Spike] Should we integrate JADE with Flow?
Closed, DeclinedPublic

Description

A threaded discussion system would be the ideal medium for human-provided critique. People will want to respond to each other's notes, and should be encouraged to do so.

Flow provides a well supported, wiki-integrated environment in which we can hold threaded discussions.

Event Timeline

awight created this task.Dec 13 2016, 11:30 PM
Halfak renamed this task from Spike: Should we integrate Meta ORES with Flow? to [Spike] Should we integrate Meta ORES with Flow?.Dec 15 2016, 3:25 PM
Halfak raised the priority of this task from Low to Needs Triage.
Halfak triaged this task as Low priority.Jan 19 2017, 3:51 PM
Halfak moved this task from Untriaged to New development on the Scoring-platform-team board.
Halfak renamed this task from [Spike] Should we integrate Meta ORES with Flow? to [Spike] Should we integrate JADE with Flow?.Oct 12 2017, 7:49 PM
Halfak updated the task description. (Show Details)

I just posted https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tzw0uv2bucrdprm4 which describes a workflow that involves a "discussion post". I was imagining a flow topic. So I made another post specifically about using Flow boards. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tzw3qg8qiqow10d8

awight closed this task as Declined.Jun 26 2018, 12:27 PM

We've decided to use talk pages and leave the coupling very loose, just that a Jade page is 1:1 with a Jade_talk page, with no additional structure. Whether or not the talk pages use Structured Discussions is entirely up the discretion of each wiki's community.