If a newsletter is protected, and someone who has the ability to manage newsletters but cannot edit through the protection tries edit it, they can still make changes, which are then sumbitted without creating a new revision in the history.
|mediawiki/extensions/Newsletter||master||+42 -48||Fix error handling and abuse filter integration during edit|
I wonder whether this problem can still be reproduced.
About the use case itself, the basic way to protect a user from making changes to a newsletter is not to allow them to have the publisher role. Trying to protect a newsletter from their publishers seems a wrong approach by design.
Or am I misunderstanding something?