Include some analysis of how much review work our draftquality model can help with.
@Halfak has some datasets that will likely help substantially.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T156494 Perform basic analysis of enwiki article creation rates | |||
| Resolved | Halfak | T156642 Generate scored dataset for 2016-08 - 2017-01 |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Do we still need to do this? We have the data in ores_classification table and it's just a matter of a query :)
Comment Actions
I think this would be a great task to have a newcomer try out at the hackathon.
E.g. how many new articles could we not review and still be guaranteed to catch 90% of the spam, attack, and vandalism pages?