https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/draftquality/?model_info
Here's an example of a prediction: https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/draftquality/762113163
There are 4 classes that the model predicts:
- OK
- Spam
- Vandalism
- Attack
https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/draftquality/?model_info
Here's an example of a prediction: https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/draftquality/762113163
There are 4 classes that the model predicts:
Whilst I welcome any form of AI that will help preserve a dwindling public respect for the quality of Wikipedia content, before deploying (or even developing) ORES for Page Curation, we need to establish why the patroller community is largely resistant to adopting the New Pages Feed and its Page Curation Tool as the default process for controlling new intake. The reasons are actually quite clear but on its own admission the Foundation no longer regards addressing them as a priority. AI is not a panacea - it should assist but not seek to replace the dysfunctional human aspect of of the triage of new pages, or be a palliative for the improvement of the parts of the Curation GUI that the Foundation will not prioritise.
The reasons are quite clear. While the page Curation and the New Pages Feed concept is vastly superior to Twinkle, and can have access limited to certain user groups, people won't use it due to it still not including some of the features of Twinkle and other features that would make patrolling even easier.