GENDER needed for singular 'User'.
URL: https://translatewiki.net/wiki/MediaWiki:Tsb-reject-confirmation/en
URL: https://translatewiki.net/wiki/MediaWiki:Tsb-accept-confirmation/en
Description
Description
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Already done
"tsb-reject-confirmation": "{{PLURAL:$1|User|Users}} rejected",
"tsb-accept-confirmation": "{{PLURAL:$1|User|Users}} accepted",Comment Actions
That's PLURAL, not GENDER, and you even should use {{PLURAL:$1|{{GENDER:$2|User}}|Users}}
Comment Actions
When the name of the user is not listed, it should be the neutral form.
There should be no GENDER when the user name is not shown or could not derived from context (like in navigation menu of user pages)
Comment Actions
emailuser is used in navigation menu, the context is set to the user.
For a message about rejecting translation or other things there is no context and the question is why it should use gender form, when the reader does not see for which user it is.
Comment Actions
@Nikerabbit, what's your say about this? Maybe you should throw more lights please? It can quickly be done if there is a conclusion :)
Comment Actions
There is a theoretical possibility that the user has updated their preference before they are accepted or rejected. But given this is a JavaScript interface, the effort to make it work (just adding GENDER to the message is not enough) is very high compared to the potential benefits.
Comment Actions
No open question in this task hence resetting status from stalled to open.
However, task could be declined due to last comment ("the effort to make it work [...] is very high compared to the potential benefits.").