Tim mentioned this last Thu when we were syncing up .. I was planning to take a look soon, but thanks for the ticket!

This was changed in T37247: content-holding <div> should only contain the page text for the MW parser but no task was created for the other parser, whoops.

To be fair, I did ask (in T37247#3181097 and on wikitech-l) for people who know about how the Parsoid ecosystem works to say whether that would be necessary or desirable, but no one replied.

In T164792#3245590, @Anomie wrote:

This was changed in T37247: content-holding <div> should only contain the page text for the MW parser but no task was created for the other parser, whoops.

To be fair, I did ask (in T37247#3181097 and on wikitech-l) for people who know about how the Parsoid ecosystem works to say whether that would be necessary or desirable, but no one replied.

It was on my list for a face-to-face discussion in Vienna as to whether this was a good idea…

Change 352711 had a related patch set uploaded (by Subramanya Sastry; owner: Subramanya Sastry):
[mediawiki/services/parsoid@master] Add mw-parser-output class to Parsoid's output

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/352711

Change 352711 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/services/parsoid@master] Add mw-parser-output class to Parsoid's output

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/352711

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2017-05-15T20:20:02Z] <subbu> Updated Parsoid to a182c227 (T141226, T164792, T37247, T153107, T163091, T164006, T161151, T162920, T163549)