Essentially, we should be able to produce a schema that makes it clear that a "damaging" model produces a score that looks like:
{ "prediction": <some string>, "probability": { "true": <some number>, "false": <some number> } }
Essentially, we should be able to produce a schema that makes it clear that a "damaging" model produces a score that looks like:
{ "prediction": <some string>, "probability": { "true": <some number>, "false": <some number> } }
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declined | Xqt | T125197 Give hint to the current socketIO_client in ImportError of rcstream.py | |||
Declined | None | T91393 RCStream is not accessible from python client due to using socket-io 1.0 while only socket-io 0.9 is offered | |||
Declined | None | T68232 Upgrade RCStream backend to use socket.io 1.0 protocol | |||
Resolved | Ottomata | T130651 EventStreams | |||
Resolved | Ottomata | T149736 Bikeshed what events should be exposed in public EventStreams API | |||
Invalid | None | T144463 Add ORES good-faith scores to the ReviewStream feed and set simplified labels to aid their interpretation | |||
Duplicate | None | T144464 Add ORES damaging scores to the ReviewStream feed and set simplified labels to aid their interpretation | |||
Declined | None | T143743 Set up the foundation for the ReviewStream feed | |||
Resolved | Ottomata | T167180 Emit revision-score event to EventBus and expose in EventStreams | |||
Resolved | Halfak | T172566 Include label-specific schemas with model_info |