Jupyter notebooks have begun to be cited on Wikimedia projects (examples: Wikipedia article, file page, meetup page and of course PAWS), but we currently have no simple way to validate whether these notebooks are actually running, so that readers can benefit from them.

In this session, I propose to build on some earlier work on assessing the reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks shared along with scientific publications (initial summary) or on Wikimedia sites (summary), to improve some first tools to validate Jupyter notebooks and to integrate them into Wikimedia workflows:

• a continuous integration workflow for Jupyter notebooks
• a Jupyter notebook that can run Jupyter notebooks and document the error messages