https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=group0.dblist
Briefly discussed this with @Bawolff last week. zerowiki is pretty obscure but apparently important to Wikipedia Zero, so it really shouldn't be in group0. Maybe @Yurik can shed some light onto why its in group0 and if there's any need for it to stay there?
@dr0ptp4kt Do you remember why zerowiki was in group0 (first to get new code)? I remember there being a reason, but that's all I got.
when making zeroportal changes (configuration for all zero-using wikis), it was good to get them into production before any of the wikis that actually used them. Also, this way it was possible to test both client and server (zeroportal and test.wp), so that by group1, basic problems would be spotted.
Thank you, that's what I sort of remembered from when we moved it, and it makes more sense now. I'm fine with leaving it in group0 to be honest.