Please add user groups rollbacker, autopatrolled, Sindhi Wiki per https://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:نياتي_باب#رائے شماری برائے rollbacker, autopatrolled

https://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:نياتي_باب#.D8.B1.D8.A7.D8.A6.DB.92_.D8.B4.D9.85.D8.A7.D8.B1.DB.8C_.D8.A8.D8.B1.D8.A7.D8.A6.DB.92_rollbacker.2C_autopatrolled

@BukhariSaeed Please notify when Discussion is over. Thank you.

Added description and Community-consensus-needed.

Community-consensus completed,
https://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:نياتي_باب#.D8.B1.D8.A7.D8.A6.DB.92_.D8.B4.D9.85.D8.A7.D8.B1.DB.8C_.D8.A8.D8.B1.D8.A7.D8.A6.DB.92_rollbacker.2C_autopatrolled

the reason of less agrees ( تائید) is that there are no active users on sindhi wiki, but admin of sindhi wiki "مھتاب احمد" (Mehtab Ahmed) agree on consensus. Thanks

@BukhariSaeed Any Community-consensus run at least a week. And By the way, If there is less Community on Sdwiki, than Why you need this User Rights. @MarcoAurelio Autopatroller groups is ok because Some pages set this level for Edits. But Rollbacker Group is not Ok. What about that. Please Suggest us as You are Steward.

@Jayprakash12345 I don't need this Rights, i am urdu wikipedian. My friend and admin of sdwiki needs this.

Ok wait for atleast one week. :)

@BukhariSaeed I am going to only enable autopatroller groups. Because there is less Community. So Rollbacker Group is not Ok.

Change 382934 had a related patch set uploaded (by Jayprakash12345; owner: Jayprakash12345):
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add autopatrolled user group to sd.wikipedia

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/382934

Schedule for October 09, 18:00–19:00 UTC

Change 382934 merged by jenkins-bot:
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add autopatrolled user group to sd.wikipedia

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/382934

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2017-10-09T18:45:42Z] <hashar@tin> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: Add autopatrolled user group to sd.wikipedia - T177141 (duration: 00m 47s)

@Jayprakash12345 please enable rollbacker group on sdwiki

@Jayprakash12345 see this request

In T177141#4210174, @BukhariSaeed wrote:

@Jayprakash12345 please enable rollbacker group on sdwiki

Please make a new task with Community-consensus link.

@BukhariSaeed Consider my last comment.

In T177141#4241109, @Urbanecm wrote:

I agree with @Jayprakash12345. Project with 36 editors and 2 administrators don't need rollbacker. From history, this can cause big social issues on wikis.

Dear @Jayprakash12345 , I agree with @BukhariSaeed , we need rollbacker and autopatroller user rights enabled on sdwiki, please consider the request and there is already consensus done for this and link is given above.

Please provide actual arguments that pick up previously given arguments (for example: "From history, this can cause big social issues on wikis").
"me too" / "I don't like this" comments do not help if you want to challenge other people's positions.

there is already consensus done

Note that https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Limits_to_configuration_changes exists (I am not saying though that this is or should be applied in this very case.)