Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Declined | Keegan | T180139 [Story] Support community/volunteer tools around Structured Commons | |||
Declined | Keegan | T180197 [Epic] Support needed changes to volunteer tools for Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata that will benefit from operating with structured data on Commons | |||
Resolved | None | T215409 GLAM as focus area at the Wikimania 2019 Hackathon | |||
Open | None | T181057 Make the Pattypan upload tool for Wikimedia Commons ready to work with Structured Commons as well |
Event Timeline
I filed https://github.com/yarl/pattypan/issues/92 specifically to track File captions :)
Putting this task on the list for Wikimania-Hackathon-2019 (GLAM focus area). Feel free to remove again if this doesn't make sense.
As soon as 'other statements' are deployed on StructuredDataOnCommons it may make sense to work on this.
I will be happy to help and provide advice on how to construct typical structured data-driven equivalents (and/or complements) of the Photograph, Artwork, Map, Art photo ... templates if needed.
This task has been assigned to the same task owner for more than two years. Resetting task assignee due to inactivity, to decrease task cookie-licking and to get a slightly more realistic overview of plans. Please feel free to assign this task to yourself again if you still realistically work or plan to work on this task - it would be welcome!
For tips how to manage individual work in Phabricator (noisy notifications, lists of task, etc.), see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228575#6237124 for available options.
(For the records, two emails were sent to assignee addresses before resetting assignees. See T228575 for more info and for potential feedback. Thanks!)
IMO, it does make sense to keep this task open (although unassigned).
There are no batch upload tools for StructuredDataOnCommons yet; no final decisions have been made yet on which tool would be best up for the job, and no development has started yet. A batch upload tool is very much needed though, especially to make sure that new GLAM uploads can also get structured data from the start.
AFAIK it's still a valid idea to extend Pattypan with SDC functionality, although OpenRefine is also looked at as an option.