Page MenuHomePhabricator

Explain to TechComm (Daniel K) part of learnings from ORES post-mortem re arch reviews
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

A quick email to him should suffice.

The outcome of this may or may not be something TechComm *does*. We'll see what makes the most sense in conversation.

Event Timeline

greg triaged this task as High priority.Dec 11 2017, 10:06 PM
greg created this task.
greg removed a project: User-greg.

Sent off email to @daniel before the holidays with some observations and questions regarding the review queue process as it stands today and areas that we could improve it. I think the question is two-fold: What review should we do prior to deploying something into production for the first time vs what should we do on an ongoing basis when something is in production.

Whatever we decide, we do need to be conscious about balancing the impact we seek to have in the overall quality of what gets deployed with being able to deliver changes/value in a timely manor.

Moved to Resolved. Additional discussions to be had as we start revisiting/refactoring the Review Process.