Hello,
As we did with https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T126561, we would need to use the Visual Editor into the "Project" namespace (ns102) please.
The consensus is here: https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversit%C3%A9:La_salle_caf%C3%A9/d%C3%A9cembre_2017
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T126561 Extension of the Visual Editor namespaces on the French Wikiversity | |||
| Declined | • marcella | T182669 Extension of the Visual Editor namespaces on the French Wikiversity to "Project" (ns102) |
Hello, in fact our community allow the visual editor on all namespace if there is no technical problem. See this page for decision taking process : https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Projet:Wikiversit%C3%A9/%C3%89diteur_Visuel_2
@Aklapper can you tell us what to make for finalize this issue ?
Resetting priority back to Needs Triage. Please do not change it unless you plan to work on this task. Thanks!
@Urbanecm Hello, as your are the lasts person giving attention to this post and as you seem more active than me on phabricator, can you please tel me if this task keep the attention of some one ? I feel some time lonely front of issue concerning fr.wikiversity. Thanks again.
Hi @Lionel_Scheepmans -- I have some good news and bad news about your request.
First, the bad: Project namespace pages are often used as talk pages, and we're not able to release VE on talk pages right now.
The good news is that the Wikimedia Foundation is starting the planning process for a big global Talk pages consultation which will begin in February. The idea is that we need to step back from LiquidThreads and Flow, and start over with a totally public and transparent consultation. We want to bring together as many people as possible, and come to consensus on the problems with talk pages that we want to solve, the good things about talk pages that we want to keep, and the tradeoffs involved in finding a solution that will work for new and experienced editors. You can read a lot more about it on that project page that I linked. The planning has just started, and we're starting to talk about the structure for this consultation and how it's going to work. We'd like to include all of you in the consultation, if you're interested. There's a lot to talk about and figure out.
I'm sure this will be disappointing right now; I hope it's also heartening to know that this problem will get a lot of attention next year.