See previous: T176523: End of Q1 grooming
Description
Description
Related Objects
Related Objects
- Mentioned Here
- T176523: End of Q1 grooming
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
- Closed, assigned to people in RelEng, not in Q1 archive project, updated after Sep 30, 2017:
- Closed, assigned to people in RelEng, not in -kanban, not in Q1 archive project, updated before July 1, 2017:
- Closed, assigned to people in RelEng, not in -kanban, not in Q1 archive, update after June 30, 2017, updated before Oct 1, 2017:
Comment Actions
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/daemon/bulk/view/1287/
- Closed, assigned to people in RelEng, not in -kanban, not in Q1 archive project, updated before July 1, 2017:
omg 2842 tasks do I really want to?!
- Closed, assigned to people in RelEng, not in -kanban, not in Q1 archive, update after June 30, 2017, updated before Oct 1, 2017:
Comment Actions
@mmodell: should I not? from a perf perspective? (using @Phabricator_maintenance obviously)
Comment Actions
This is done for Q2, open question for @mmodell above, but that's super low priority.
Comment Actions
@greg: I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. Closed tasks cease to have much visibility so I don't know if there is much value in organizing them.