In case it's useful, my notes about my feedback at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Markus_Kr%C3%B6tzsch/Wikidata_queries#Feedback

Some example data here: https://github.com/Wikidata/QueryAnalysis/tree/master/exampleMonthsFolder/exampleMonth/anonymousRawData

I had a look at the sample, but there doesn't seem to be any data. The three compressed files seem empty.

Would add below what exactly you had asked the legal team to review (so people can know what was approved).

Somehow it seems odd that full logs would be published by WMF.

Somehow it seems odd that full logs would be published by WMF.

They won't be. Please see in the proposal what exactly is planned to be published, it is in no way or form "full logs", it's highly filtered to remove anything that could even hint at PII.

I can see data at https://github.com/Wikidata/QueryAnalysis/tree/master/exampleMonthsFolder/exampleMonth/anonymousRawData just fine, they are not empty. Maybe there was some download issue? You can just click on any file there and download it directly from github, I just checked and it works.

Thanks. I can get it to load know. Not sure what happened. I will have a look.

Is it correct the it includes all queries for these weeks, formatting is not standardized beyond variable names and all QIDs are included as is?

it includes all queries for these weeks

Yes, all syntactically correct queries.

formatting is not standardized beyond variable names

Not true, queries are reformatted. Please do check https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Markus_Kr%C3%B6tzsch/Wikidata_queries#How_is_this_data_generated? - it describes the whole procedure in detail.

all QIDs are included as is

Yes. All P-ids and Q-ids are preserved.

Is there something that concerns you specifically?