GSoC Candidates has expressed that they would really like a testing environment for T175768. Indeed, our past live-testing probably wont scale when it comes to doing mass-changes like replacing an underlying kubernetes library.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | None | T175768 Improvements for the Toolforge 'webservice' command | |||
| Resolved | None | T190884 Replicate toolforge 'webservice' setup in toolsbeta | |||
| Resolved | zhuyifei1999 | T190893 Setup the webservice-related instances in toolsbeta | |||
| Resolved | Andrew | T190895 Request increased quota for toolsbeta | |||
| Resolved | zhuyifei1999 | T192618 Can't ssh into new instance created at toolsbeta | |||
| Resolved | Andrew | T190896 Request addition to 'toolsbeta.admin' service group |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Next question: considering that the docker containers contains the webservice code, which are subject to modification for the parent task, is it necessary to separate toolsbeta's aptly and docker-builder from toolforge's?