Page MenuHomePhabricator

Make MGChecker maintainer of Extension:LanguageTag & InteractiveBlockMessage
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

I would like to propose MGChecker as the maintainer of Extension:LanguageTag & Extension:InteractiveBlockMessage

There is some easy task, which is about three months ago, yet not merge. MGChecker played a responsible role in other extension's +2 right. So giving him +2 may not be harmful.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/406053/
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/406330/

Event Timeline

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald Transcript

First patch has still issues, if you look for Umherirrenders comment.

I can certainly handle +2 rights and merge generic patches like this, however I won't be able to spend as much effort as I did to familarize myself with the Variables extension. Please consider this if you want to add an additional maintainer. I probably won't be able to merge more specific patches than those.

Hmm, any additional opinions on the last two comments? I don't want this task to become stalled forever. :-/

Vvjjkkii renamed this task from Make MGChecker maintainer of Extension:LanguageTag & InteractiveBlockMessage to u8daaaaaaa.Jul 1 2018, 1:14 AM
Vvjjkkii triaged this task as High priority.
Vvjjkkii updated the task description. (Show Details)
Vvjjkkii removed a subscriber: Aklapper.
Mainframe98 renamed this task from u8daaaaaaa to Make MGChecker maintainer of Extension:LanguageTag & InteractiveBlockMessage.Jul 1 2018, 8:04 AM
Mainframe98 raised the priority of this task from High to Needs Triage.
Mainframe98 updated the task description. (Show Details)
Mainframe98 added a subscriber: Aklapper.

I think some time has passed already so a decision could be made. Can any Gerrit Administrator make a decision here? Thanks!

Hello. This ticket is opened since April. If there are any concerns about the request, please voice them. If there are not any, what's holding this? Thanks.

If there are not any, what's holding this?

I don't know about other people, but personally I fail to see in the task description the usual information about the proposed maintainer's coding contributions, so I would need to do some additional research to even start forming an opinion.

What Nemo said, as well as my reading of T193049#4162917 gave me the impression that MGChecker wasn't interested in serving as the maintainer.

If @MGChecker could confirm whether (s)he is still interested I think we could move forward faster I think? Thanks.

As I stated before, if I got these rights, I would use them to merge patches I can judge with my knowledge of the parser and similar extensions. However, I never contributed to these extensions and won't have the resources to do active development in the near future, as I focus myself on extensions with a heavier impact on the MediaWiki universe. If you think this suffices the demands you have on a maintainer, you're free to add me, if you don't think so, it's fine as well.

Even though I would use +2 permissions responsibly, I'm sure there are other people more experienced in code writing and review that could handle this job better.

tstarling claimed this task.

TechCom resolved that the request be approved. I made the relevant changes in Gerrit.