Currently, a lexeme lemma and a form representation can both contain a “soft hyphen” character (U+00AD; example lexeme). I’m not sure if we should allow this or not… on the one hand, it would be tempting to have soft hyphens in all lemmas and representations, so that they’re automatically wrapped nicely etc. – on the other hand, that’s not going to happen, and allowing an inconsistent state (some lexemes have soft hyphens, most don’t) is probably worse all around. I assume there will be dedicated statements for hyphenation, that should be enough.
Description
Description
Related Objects
Related Objects
Event Timeline
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptMay 22 2018, 2:26 PM2018-05-22 14:26:47 (UTC+0)
Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE updated the task description. (Show Details)May 22 2018, 2:27 PM2018-05-22 14:27:00 (UTC+0)
Lydia_Pintscher moved this task from incoming to features/bugs for later releases on the Wikidata Lexicographical data board.May 23 2018, 9:17 AM2018-05-23 09:17:56 (UTC+0)
Comment Actions
While I agree that there generally shouldn't be hyphens in Lemma and representation I am not sure we should prevent it. Thoughts from others?
• Vvjjkkii renamed this task from Soft hyphen in lexeme lemma and form representation to eicaaaaaaa.Jul 1 2018, 1:08 AM2018-07-01 01:08:32 (UTC+0)
CommunityTechBot renamed this task from eicaaaaaaa to Soft hyphen in lexeme lemma and form representation.Jul 2 2018, 3:58 PM2018-07-02 15:58:54 (UTC+0)