Take decision if we should use P3842 located in present-day administrative territorial entity for some "församlingar" or Tora objects....
The benefits are that we could group Tora objects and related objects in a good way and we get rid of the problem that "församlingskod" P778 not is good modelled over time...
There are gadgets like User:Pasleim/derivedstatements.js that really nice displays items relating to an object eg. Q214048 Norrtälje kommun ==> we get a list of items like Husby-Sjuhundra 136:3
I can see this could be useful for TORA objects to list the together with other items like P1260 objects from Riksantikvarieämbetets Cultural heritage database in Sweden
Contemporary constraint check
There is a plan for a new Wikidata constraint that will check if all objects existed at the same time this will impact that we need to have name changes correct in Wikidata with a start and end time
- Q25796498 contemporary constraint - type of constraint for Wikidata properties: used to specify that the subject and the object have to coincide or coexist at some point of history
- T141859: [Task] Contemporary constraint check
- project Wikibase-Quality-Constraints
- T200500: Church parish "församling" is changing name
- Status question Talk:Q25796498#Status_future_plans?