Our dear bohrium (running Piwik/Matomo) would need to be upgraded to Debian Stretch, so I'd like to request a new Ganeti VM with the following specs:
@Ottomata: for the naming part, we could either call it piwik/matomo1001 or analytics-tools1004. What do you think?
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet | operations/puppet | production | +6 -1 | |
| Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet | operations/dns | master | +2 -1 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | elukey | T192642 Upgrade Analytics infrastructure to Debian Stretch | |||
| Resolved | elukey | T202962 Upgrade bohrium (piwik/matomo) to Debian Stretch | |||
| Resolved | elukey | T202963 eqiad (1) - VM request for Piwik/Matomo |
@elukey: Totally doable disk wise.
Network wise, bohrium is at private1-a-eqiad, so no analytics network. Just making sure :D
Can I also assume we will be deleting bohrium after that ?
Naming wise I leave it up to you, just give me a DNS :-)
+1!
Can I also assume we will be deleting bohrium after that ?
Yes this is the plan, once the new mv takes over its traffic we'll nuke it :)
Naming wise I leave it up to you, just give me a DNS :-)
matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet
Thanks!
Change 460276 had a related patch set uploaded (by Alexandros Kosiaris; owner: Alexandros Kosiaris):
[operations/dns@master] Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet
Change 460276 merged by Alexandros Kosiaris:
[operations/dns@master] Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet
Change 460353 had a related patch set uploaded (by Alexandros Kosiaris; owner: Alexandros Kosiaris):
[operations/puppet@production] Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet
Change 460353 merged by Alexandros Kosiaris:
[operations/puppet@production] Introduce matomo1001.eqiad.wmnet
@elukey VM is up and running. No role assigned in puppet so you probably want to handle that. Resolving this.