Although most of the copyvio work has been being tested by @Etonkovidova in Beta Labs, the community will need to test it in Test Wiki. There is work we need to do in Test Wiki so that @Etonkovidova and the community can test:
Assigning this to @Catrope because he has most of the ideas on how to do this.
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | MMiller_WMF | T193782 [EPIC] Prioritization tools for AfC and NPP | |||
| Resolved | MMiller_WMF | T199359 New Pages Feed: copyvio addition | |||
| Resolved | Catrope | T203119 Copyvio: prepare Test Wiki for community testing |
I have created 3 pages in NPP and 3 pages in AFC. One each with:
All six pages have names that correspond to pages that are in enwiki's CopyPatrol queue, so the "copyvio" links point to real results in CopyPatrol (except for drafts, because of T203284: "Copyvio" link to CopyPatrol doesn't work for drafts, should drop Draft: namespace prefix).
I also modified the DB to mark the 3 NPP pages as unreviewed (they were marked as reviewed automatically, because I'm an autopatrolled user). I didn't bother doing this for the AFC ones, because the reviewed-ness status isn't exposed there.
As follow-up to this, @MMiller_WMF said he would put the draft pages in different categories so they have different AFC statuses.
I have made it so that each of the three drafts are one of these statuses:
Checked the test data sample in testwiki (along with verifying T201070) - Copyvio filter works as expected and the test sample has articles in the following states: