Come up with a wireframe showing what Jade integration into watchlists might look like.
Mainly this includes coming up with the types of views we'll want to enable.
Come up with a wireframe showing what Jade integration into watchlists might look like.
Mainly this includes coming up with the types of views we'll want to enable.
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open | None | T212435 Review real-world query plans and performance for Jade | |||
Open | None | T238877 Write Huggle labels to Jade | |||
Resolved | calbon | T183381 Deploy pilot of Jade to a small set of wikis. | |||
Declined | None | T201361 Jade Implementation: Watchlist integration | |||
Declined | None | T212373 Complete Jade user testing | |||
Duplicate | None | T210535 [EPIC] Jade Mockups: Prepare mockups of Jade initial feature set for user testing | |||
Declined | None | T210560 Jade Mockups: Watchlist integration | |||
Declined | None | T212378 Jade Wireframes: Watchlist integration |
Looking at this now. I'm wondering if we're looking for anything beyond designing the filter-controls for the new changes filters. E.g. "show me changes that have not already been judged" This would be directly applicable to any other places that the changes filters show up (E.g. recentchanges)
Specific to a watchlist we could include a flag for "watched page judgment edits" that would include edits to judgments of watched pages.
Right, we shouldn't need anything terribly novel in terms of design here. A wireframe would just show what the current watchlist feed would look like with the Jade-specific features enabled.
At one point we were looking at nesting the judgments in new RC layouts, either indenting under the target revision if it also appears in the page of results, or indenting along with multiple revisions on the page. But I think we've scaled back to the minimal approach, that judgment edits will appear as top-level RC entries in normal chronological sequence with content edits.
We could still put the consensus judgment information inline for many judgement types. It would be very useful for editquality. It might be less useful for articlequality as a revision is unlikely to be recent enough by the time it is assessed to be seen.