Sometimes additional discussion or details are desirable when users make a new partner suggestion (https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/). We could add a commenting system, like that for applications, through which we could ask clarifying questions or invite additional notes from other users.
This is very important.
Many resources are often available via alternate mediums as well and after a discussion, it can emerge that most of the houses stuff is already available by resources that we already possess.
I notice at-least one source; which has deemed to be generally unreliable at RSN but can be used in specific cases. So does it merit to include that as a resource? These discussions need to happen.
The coordinators can also note about the progress of the application (did not respond/ in active talks/almost set up/talked but reached an impasse et al).