Sometimes additional discussion or details are desirable when users make a new partner suggestion (https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/). We could add a commenting system, like that for applications, through which we could ask clarifying questions or invite additional notes from other users.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | Scardenasmolinar | T240165 Improve the publisher suggestion process for The Wikipedia Library | |||
| Declined | None | T214164 Add Commenting to Suggestions | |||
| Resolved | rajarshi | T218849 Denote proposer on Suggest page |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
This is very important.
Many resources are often available via alternate mediums as well and after a discussion, it can emerge that most of the houses stuff is already available by resources that we already possess.
I notice at-least one source; which has deemed to be generally unreliable at RSN but can be used in specific cases. So does it merit to include that as a resource? These discussions need to happen.
The coordinators can also note about the progress of the application (did not respond/ in active talks/almost set up/talked but reached an impasse et al).
Comment Actions
We declined this because it would necessitate a large overhead of related features that duplicate on-wiki communication functionality.