E.g. here—the original statement was +1932-01-01T00:00:00Z with precision 9, i.e. the year 1932; the value merged in is +1932-00-00T00:00:00Z with precision 9, i.e. the year 1932 as well. These values are different from the technical point of view, but from the user’s point of view identical values are not merged, which is bad user experience.
|Open||None||T87764 Bugs related to time datatype (tracking)|
|Open||BUG REPORT||None||T221610 Date statements aren’t merged if the displayed text is the same but internal representation is different|