Description
Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open | None | T224333 It's possible to save a statement with duplicate references | |||
Open | Feature | None | T360224 Improve Wikidata handling of duplicate references in model and UI |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I am not sure at which point we can prohibit this. Because I assume we wouldn't want to prevent someone from entering two references, starting both with the same snaks and only then adding the differentiating snaks.
Comment Actions
I think it should be prevented in any case. More precisely, I think we should prevent adding exactly equal references and also adding references which present the same parts in a different order, and afterwards we should send a cleaning-bot.
I add an example:
- I added one reference
- then I added the same reference, only changing the order of its parts: it worked (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q369129&diff=1320370815&oldid=1320370672)
- then I added the same reference, exactly equal to its first configuration: it worked (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q369129&diff=1320370908&oldid=1320370815)
Both the second and the third case should not work.