You may want to bring this up at https://github.com/wikimedia/database-reports/issues and https://github.com/mzmcbride/database-reports/issues instead where the issue trackers for these code bases are, and/or update https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports ?

Yes, editors eligible for autopatrol privilege, top new article reviewers and stale drafts were written in Ruby. The entries in Wikipedia:Database reports include a link to the source code. I suggest we do the same for the other reports, rather than linking to on-wiki copies of the code.

In T225047#5237716, @MusikAnimal wrote:

The entries in Wikipedia:Database reports include a link to the source code. I suggest we do the same for the other reports, rather than linking to on-wiki copies of the code.

Yeah, agreed. In 2008, it seemed reasonable to have a copy of the code on-wiki. Places such as GitHub were only a few months old at the time, after all. :-) In 2019, with Git having taken over the world, it makes less sense. It was a nice side-benefit to have the code included in wiki database dumps and backups, but it's also contributed to confusion over the years as to whether the wiki pages actually get executed.