Examine the data we got from UNESCO: pictures and metadata.
- Feedback for A.C. about the metadata sample and possible issues
- Download image dump
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T294440 ☂ Umbrella task for work with UN/IGOs/iNGOs | |||
| Open | None | T250804 ☂️Cooperation with UNESCO Archives | |||
| Resolved | Jopparn | T215269 FindingGLAMs media uploads | |||
| Resolved | Jopparn | T230899 Work with UNESCO Archives material | |||
| Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T230898 Examine material from UNESCO | |||
| Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T231782 Join metadata files |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
In general, I'm very happy with the metadata. It's simple but should be enough, and the descriptions are good (that's the part that would be most interesting to the viewers, I imagine). I have raised these issues:
- Is there some way to link the viewer to a copy of the photo on the Unesco Archives website? E.g. using the Barcode ID?
- We got a new column with permalinks
- What's the difference between "Description" and "English/French transcr."? Could you provide some background on which content goes where?
- Transcr. is what was written on the back side of the photo.
- It looks to me that the name of the photographer field is "Simple value", is that correct?
- Yes
- Is it possible to put the city name in a separate column?
- We got a separate column :)