Instrument replying workflow (v1.0)
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Description

In order to better understand how contributors engage with the new replying feature and decide whether any adjustments need to be made to it, we need to instrument each step of the workflow.

This task is about implementing the instrumentation that will enable us to track the events defined in the measurement plan. [1]

Instrumentation spec

The instrumentation spec can be found here (limited access): Talk pages/Replying/Instrumentation spec

Done

The events listed in the "Instrumentation spec" have been implemented

Details

	Subject	Repo	Branch	Lines +/-
	Instrumentation	mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools	master	+279 -3

Customize query in gerrit

Related Objects
Search...

Status	Assigned	Task
Open	None	T233443 [Epic] Reply Tool
Resolved	• ppelberg	T244500 Instrument new replying workflow
Resolved	DLynch	T243364 Instrument replying workflow (v1.0)
Resolved	• ppelberg	T240056 [Spike] What schema should be used to track usage of Replying v1.0?
Resolved	DLynch	T243467 Changes to EditAttemptStep schema for Discussion Tools Replying V1.0
Resolved	Mayakp.wiki	T244874 QA replying workflow (v1.0) instrumentation
Resolved	Milimetric	T246382 New EventLogging queue doesn't log events in window.unload

Event Timeline

• ppelberg created this task.Jan 22 2020, 1:19 AM

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptJan 22 2020, 1:19 AM

• ppelberg added a parent task: T233443: [Epic] Reply Tool.Jan 22 2020, 1:20 AM

• ppelberg added a subtask: T243363: Mockup new schema to log DiscussionTools-related events.

Mayakp.wiki added a subtask: T240056: [Spike] What schema should be used to track usage of Replying v1.0?.Jan 22 2020, 7:53 PM

• ppelberg mentioned this in T235923: Replies v1.0: release replying to specific comments.Feb 3 2020, 10:56 PM

JTannerWMF moved this task from Backlog to OWC2020 Replying 1.0 on the OWC2020 board.Feb 4 2020, 11:36 PM

JTannerWMF edited projects, added OWC2020 (OWC2020 Replying 1.0); removed OWC2020.

JTannerWMF edited projects, added Editing-team (Q3 2019-2020 Kanban Board); removed VisualEditor, Editing-team.Feb 5 2020, 1:13 AM

JTannerWMF moved this task from Needs Discussion / Investigation to Upcoming on the Editing-team (Q3 2019-2020 Kanban Board) board.

JTannerWMF moved this task from Needs Prioritization to Required before Release on the OWC2020 (OWC2020 Replying 1.0) board.

matmarex added a project: DiscussionTools.Feb 5 2020, 1:33 AM

We are waiting for the implementation of T243363. Afterwards this will become high priority.

• ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)Feb 6 2020, 3:50 PM

In T243364#5853212, @JTannerWMF wrote:

We are waiting for the implementation of T243363. Afterwards this will become high priority.

After talking with @Mayakp.wiki yesterday about the conversations she and @DLynch have been, it's become clear work on this ticket can start before the new schema for tracking DiscussionTools-related events has been implemented (T243363).

Said in another way: all of the events we are needing to track in v1.0 can be logged in EditAttemptStep and do not need to be logged in a new schema.

Next steps
Once instrumentation for v1.0 has been implemented, we will need to:

Determine what additional actions/features will be introduced in v1.1 and v2.0 that will require instrumentation
Depending on what instrumentation is required, we will need to implement the new schema we will have designed in T243363