Usually and in large incident it's me and Adam that help with the incident from WMDE and I don't remember anyone else from WMDE helping in any large incidents. OTOH most of the devs have prod access and would be able to help if needed. I think @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE would be a great help too. I think, Adam, Lucas, and I can be given automatically and we will added any people if needed, if it happens too often, we let you know to add more people as a default.

Thanks! I'll bring this up in the SRE meeting on Monday and go ahead if no one objects.

"On Monday" turned out to be two weeks later -- sorry about that. Conclusions from today's SRE meeting, documented for posterity:

• Yes, in principle we should do this.
• Incident docs contain PII and other sensitive matter, so this requires an NDA on file for anyone we add, and a reminder that the contents of an incident status doc are confidential and can't be shared more broadly, even e.g. within WMDE.
• We should also add a "confidential" label to the status doc template.
• There's consensus among SRE to add the three specific folks named in this ticket, but we'll bring any future proposed additions back to the SRE meeting, rather than establishing a general rule.

I have a pending email to Legal to make sure I have all the details straight with respect to confidentiality policy. Assuming I get the thumbs up from them, I'll make the changes as described. Thanks WMDE friends for your patience.

In T244395#5914004, @RLazarus wrote:

"On Monday" turned out to be two weeks later -- sorry about that. Conclusions from today's SRE meeting, documented for posterity:

• Yes, in principle we should do this.
• Incident docs contain PII and other sensitive matter, so this requires an NDA on file for anyone we add, and a reminder that the contents of an incident status doc are confidential and can't be shared more broadly, even e.g. within WMDE.
• We should also add a "confidential" label to the status doc template.
• There's consensus among SRE to add the three specific folks named in this ticket, but we'll bring any future proposed additions back to the SRE meeting, rather than establishing a general rule.

I have a pending email to Legal to make sure I have all the details straight with respect to confidentiality policy. Assuming I get the thumbs up from them, I'll make the changes as described. Thanks WMDE friends for your patience.

Thank you for the update @RLazarus, greatly appreciated and thank you for trusting me :)

Ping :)

Sorry for the delay, but this is still in progress -- I've checked in with Legal and they're still working on it. Thanks for your patience, still.

Thanks!

Works for me, thanks! I added a description to the folder so we (in WMDE) hopefully don’t forget it’s confidential.