Weekly update: not started yet. First steps will be to start gathering survey data / literature review.

Weekly update: no progress.

Weekly update: no progress

Weekly update:
Gathered a bunch of relevant surveys:

• Official WMF surveys (on-wiki):
  • 2008 UNU-MERIT Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:UNU-MERIT_Wikipedia_survey
  • April 2011 Editor Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editors_Survey_2011_April
  • November 2011 Editor Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editors_Survey_2011_November
  • 2012 Editor Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editors_Survey_2012
  • 2014 Global South User Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Global_South_User_Survey_2014
  • 2017 Community Insights Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Insights/2016-17_Report
  • 2018 Community Insights Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Insights/2018_Report
  • Pending: 2019 Community Insights Survey
• Research surveys
  • 2013 VisualEditor Gender Microsurvey (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Gender_micro-survey
  • 2019 Editor Gender Surveys (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Surveys_on_the_gender_of_editors
• Outside / Panel Surveys
  • 2011 Readership Survey (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Readership_Survey_2011
  • 2011 Mobile Readers Survey (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Mobile_Readers_Survey_2011
  • The Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities: The Case of Wikipedia Editing (Shaw and Hargittai): https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/68/1/143/4915319?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  • 2017 Strategy Surveys (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Sources/Brand_awareness,_attitudes,_and_usage_research_(July_2017)
  • 2019 YouGov Survey of Women and Wikipedia (WMF): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/YouGov_survey_on_women_and_Wikipedia
• Affiliate surveys (on-wiki)
  • 2012 Bangla Wikipedia Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Small_Wiki_Editor_Engagement_Project/Report/Monthly_(June-July_2012)
  • 2014 Pakistan Reader Survey: https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/02/20/pakistani-readers-survey/
  • 2015 Greek Wikipedia Survey: http://wikiworkshop.org/2016/papers/wikiworkshop_icwsm2016_protonotarios.pdf
  • Wikimedia CH 2015 Community Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CH/Community_Survey_2015
  • Wikimedia CH 2016 Community Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CH/Community_Survey_2016
  • WMDE 2016 Editor Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Deutschland/Editor_Survey_2016
  • Wikimedia CH 2017 Community Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CH/Community_Survey
  • Wikimedia Ukraine 2018 Community Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Ukraine/Community_Survey_2018

Feedback from team:

• Consider expanding more into to academic lit such as editor types, barriers, role of bots
• Possible delineation to highlight -- contributors can be bots (developers), editors (users), and anonymous contributors
• In barriers/solutions, we should comment availability (or lack of) tools like Visual Editor -- e.g., https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2020-May/093371.html

Weekly update:

• Updated leafs of taxonomy with the relevant surveys
• Began writing introduction to taxonomy

Weekly update:

• Focused on starting description of methods for executive summary / final report.

Weekly update: no progress

Weekly update:

• Added draft of sociodemographic gaps to taxonomy
• Began going through surveys to identify trends -- e.g., median age of editors vs. country/world population
• Updated missing Editor/Reader Survey categories to Meta to simplify the process of identifying these surveys in the future

Weekly update:

• Full first draft completed and added to Overleaf! Will continue to iterate with the team on this for the rest of the quarter.