For example in https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod%C3%A8le:Non_sign%C3%A9 the timestamp can link to a diff
Description
Description
Details
Details
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | • ppelberg | T250516 Reply tool doesn't always work on signatures from the {{unsigned}} or {{user link}} templates | |||
| Resolved | matmarex | T252059 Support signatures where the timestamp is a link |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
This can probably be done by adding .parentNode somewhere in parser#findSignature if we discover that timestampNode is wrapped in a link.
Comment Actions
Change 599118 had a related patch set uploaded (by Bartosz Dziewoński; owner: Bartosz Dziewoński):
[mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools@master] Support parsing when timestamp is wrapped in a link
Comment Actions
Change 599119 had a related patch set uploaded (by Bartosz Dziewoński; owner: Bartosz Dziewoński):
[mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools@master] Tests covering fr.wp unsigned comment templates
Comment Actions
Change 599118 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools@master] Support parsing when timestamp is wrapped in a link
Comment Actions
Change 599119 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools@master] Tests covering fr.wp unsigned comment templates
Comment Actions
I've been using this page for testing: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Le_Monde#Mort_de_Pierre_Berge
There are two unsigned comments in that section. After this patch goes live, they should both get a "Reply" link. (You might get an error after clicking them, that's expected for now and covered by T252058.)