Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add autoreviewrestore into the rollbacker group in hiwiki
Closed, ResolvedPublic


Per community consensus, please add autoreviewrestore user right into the rollbacker user group in hiwiki.

Event Timeline

CptViraj triaged this task as Medium priority.May 18 2020, 6:46 AM
RhinosF1 changed the task status from Open to Stalled.May 20 2020, 8:27 AM
RhinosF1 lowered the priority of this task from Medium to Low.

I've looked at this discussion again.

Since the objection was raised, one user has removed their support and no one has added or reaffirmed support. Consensus is a discussion and at the moment only 1 other user has given why the voted that way bar the proposer and objector. While they're support does deflect the objection, That still leaves us with a 2 supporting given that objection and 2 against.

I'd like to see more from the others that supported on whether they still agree.

@CptViraj has agreed to ping them on wiki and should reopen this task once their is renewed consensus.

RhinosF1 changed the task status from Stalled to Open.May 24 2020, 1:08 PM
RhinosF1 added a subscriber: Urbanecm.

I've discussed this with @Urbanecm and we've agreed to proceed with this.

As we count the discussion, there is overall more people in support of it and the arguments that have been given for it are strong.

Looking specifically at the argument against the proposal, we determined that an argument that they can be trusted with '(auto)patrol' is invalid. We decided this as the right only allows the automated patrolling of rolled back edits. This does not patrol any other edits nor give them the manual ability to patrol.

There is therefore consensus for this proposal to proceed.

I will be creating the patchset shortly and scheduling this for SWAT on Tuesday. If any has any issues, please comment on here before then.

Change 598245 had a related patch set uploaded (by RhinosF1; owner: RhinosF1):
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add autoreviewrestore into the rollbacker group in hiwiki

RhinosF1 raised the priority of this task from Low to Medium.May 24 2020, 1:17 PM
RhinosF1 moved this task from Configuration to Deployment on the User-RhinosF1 board.
RhinosF1 moved this task from Working on to To deploy on the Wikimedia-Site-requests board.

Change 598245 merged by jenkins-bot:
[operations/mediawiki-config@master] Add autoreviewrestore into the rollbacker group in hiwiki

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2020-05-27T23:20:55Z] <catrope@deploy1001> Synchronized wmf-config/InitialiseSettings.php: Add autoreviewrestore right to rollbacker group on hiwiki (T252986) (duration: 01m 05s)

RhinosF1 moved this task from Deployment to Done on the User-RhinosF1 board.

Deployed, sorry for the slight delay on my part!

sanjeevphys changed the task status from Resolved to Invalid.May 28 2020, 8:33 AM
sanjeevphys removed RhinosF1 as the assignee of this task.
sanjeevphys added a subscriber: sanjeevphys.

As RhinosF1 wrote in an earlier comment, there were no consensus on hiwiki. Since, the people which are counted in support are not new to hiwiki. There are my questions for the above action:

  1. Who has authenticated it from hiwiki?
  2. How did you decide that consensus is over? Since discussion was clearly saying that discussion is going on.
  3. There were only one decision taken and that was only from the proponent.

So, this action should be reverted for hiwiki.

Then this open not invalid.

  1. I spoke to @CptViraj throughout this who communicated to you multiple times on the last occasion 48 hours before this went through.
  2. We reviewed the discussion and determined the appropriate result.

Both myself and @Urbanecm agreed with the result and this was detailed in T252986#6160866

I will see if anything has changed since I reached that conclusion now.

RhinosF1 claimed this task.

I have looked at the diff since we evaluated the discussion and there is no change other than it being closed.

If you don't like the consensus reached, you need to discuss that on-wiki but this has been independantly reviewed.