Collecting ideas for interesting data to collect after WLE 2020. Any other suggestions @Eric_Luth_WMSE @AxelPettersson_WMSE ?

Average file size, number of uploads by phone and "camera".

Ranking of municipality (or County might work better) of percentage of illsutrated objects (to get a feel for if any länsstyrelse are worth targeting for 2021)

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

Number of articles with a Wiki Loves Earth 2020 photo in it
Number of Wikidata objects with a Wiki Loves Earth 2020 photo in it

In T253504#6168448, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

I don't think there's a way of getting a reliable indication here, since users don't have to self-identify?

In T253504#6187729, @Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6168448, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

I don't think there's a way of getting a reliable indication here, since users don't have to self-identify?

I've gone through and (very stereotypically) counted the among of editors with traditionally male names, traditionally female names, and names we don't know. That is, as I've understood, how it has been done previously. Not an optimal way..

In T253504#6188895, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6187729, @Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6168448, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

I don't think there's a way of getting a reliable indication here, since users don't have to self-identify?

I've gone through and (very stereotypically) counted the among of editors with traditionally male names, traditionally female names, and names we don't know. That is, as I've understood, how it has been done previously. Not an optimal way..

We've done a combination of that, looking at the very few cases where gender has been entered into the MediaWiki interface and recognising the usernames of people we know IRL.

In T253504#6191398, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

In T253504#6188895, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6187729, @Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6168448, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

I don't think there's a way of getting a reliable indication here, since users don't have to self-identify?

I've gone through and (very stereotypically) counted the among of editors with traditionally male names, traditionally female names, and names we don't know. That is, as I've understood, how it has been done previously. Not an optimal way..

We've done a combination of that, looking at the very few cases where gender has been entered into the MediaWiki interface and recognising the usernames of people we know IRL.

Here we have both extremely few users with mw-gender and lots of brand new users :D

Is there a separate task for consuming the information? (GlobalMetrics, Blogg posts, reports etc.)

In T253504#6223089, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

Is there a separate task for consuming the information? (GlobalMetrics, Blogg posts, reports etc.)

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE @Eric_Luth_WMSE

In T253504#6243632, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

In T253504#6223089, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

Is there a separate task for consuming the information? (GlobalMetrics, Blogg posts, reports etc.)

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE @Eric_Luth_WMSE

https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253518