Test VisualEditorFeatureUse schema changes in Reply Tool
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Assigned To

Authored By

	ppelberg
	Jul 23 2020, 11:42 PM

Description

This task is about testing whether the fields implemented in T252924 (listed below) are being fired and logged correctly in the Reply Tool.

Testing instructions

Testing environment

Namespace: talk
Editing interface/tool: Reply Tool
Beta/production: production
Wiki: ar.wiki, fr.wiki, hu.wiki OR nl.wiki

Events to test

When a contributor starts typing a comment and switches from the tool's source to visual mode
When a contributor starts typing a comment and switches from the tool's visual to source mode
When user starts replying and types @ in the Reply tool's visual mode
Type and bold text in the Reply Tool's visual mode
Select the Watch this page checkbox

Where to log test results

Rows 182 - 204 of the Replying QC template

Done

1. The "Events to test" have been tested
2. The results of "2." have been logged in rows 182 - 204 of the Replying QC template

Related Objects

Mentioned Here: T252930: Post-deployment QA: Reply tool v2.0 instrumentation (DB)
T252924: Add fields to VisualEditorFeatureUse

Event Timeline

ppelberg created this task.Jul 23 2020, 11:42 PM

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptJul 23 2020, 11:42 PM

ppelberg added a project: OWC2020 (OWC2020 Replying 2.0).Jul 23 2020, 11:42 PM

ppelberg moved this task from Needs Prioritization to Required for Release on the OWC2020 (OWC2020 Replying 2.0) board.

Mayakp.wiki updated the task description. (Show Details)Jul 23 2020, 11:59 PM

@Ryasmeen : I have added the events we finalized to our QC document and provided the exact section so you can find it easily.
pls feel free to reach out if you have any questions!

Tacsipacsi updated the task description. (Show Details)Jul 24 2020, 10:31 AM

Tacsipacsi added a subscriber: Tacsipacsi.

Checked all the events listed in the task and logged the test results that I found in the Replying QA template.

Ryasmeen removed a project: Editing QA.Jul 27 2020, 10:21 PM

In T258761#6339125, @Ryasmeen wrote:

Checked all the events listed in the task and logged the test results that I found in the Replying QA template.

Excellent, @Ryasmeen.

Next steps

Assuming everything is working as expected [i], @Mayakp.wiki is there any work left to be done on this task on your end (e.g. confirm the events/fields are being logged in the DB correctly)?

i. "Working as expected": as evidenced by all of the events in rows 182-204 being marked as Passed.

ppelberg edited projects, added OWC2020 (Reply Tool Opt Out); removed OWC2020 (OWC2020 Replying 2.0).Jul 27 2020, 11:05 PM

ppelberg moved this task from Needs Prioritization to Required for Release on the OWC2020 (Reply Tool Opt Out) board.

ppelberg reassigned this task from Ryasmeen to Mayakp.wiki.Jul 28 2020, 10:58 PM

ppelberg added a project: Product-Analytics.

Next steps

Assuming everything is working as expected [i], @Mayakp.wiki is there any work left to be done on this task on your end (e.g. confirm the events/fields are being logged in the DB correctly)?

i. "Working as expected": as evidenced by all of the events in rows 182-204 being marked as Passed.

@ppelberg : I checked the status and test artifacts for this task and everything looks good. Thanks @Ryasmeen !
I will look at the events being logged in the Db as a part of T252930 ie Post Deployment Data-QA .

ppelberg closed this task as Resolved.Jul 29 2020, 7:08 PM

Restricted Application added a project: User-Ryasmeen. · View Herald TranscriptJul 29 2020, 7:08 PM

Test VisualEditorFeatureUse schema changes in Reply ToolClosed, ResolvedPublicActions