Review Reply Tool test protocol
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Assigned To

Authored By

	ppelberg
	Sep 9 2020, 6:46 PM

Description

This task is about ensuring the Reply Tool testing protocol is accurate and exhaustive.

Background

Prior to deploying the Reply Tool as an opt-our preference (T249394), we would like to do our best to ensure it's working in the way we and volunteers expect.

Open questions

The questions below pertain to the Reply Tool testing protocol's "Template" sheet:

What – if any – "Test cases" should be added to the "Template" sheet? Please add them.
Which – if any – of the existing "Test cases" depend on in-progress patches? Where "depend" means a patch being merged could cause a test case to change from having Passed QA to Failing QA. Please link the tickets associated with these patches in the "Related ticket(s)" column.

Done

All "Open questions" are answered

Related Objects
Search...

Status	Assigned	Task
Open	None	T276497 Scale DiscussionTools to all projects
Open	None	T251207 [Epic] Scale DiscussionTools to all Wikipedias
Resolved	None	T262331 [Release ticket] Make Reply Tool available as opt-out preference at all Wikipedias
Open	None	T233443 [Epic] Reply Tool
Resolved	ppelberg	T249394 Deploy Reply Tool as opt-out Preference at the Arabic, Czech and Hungarian Wikipedias
Resolved	Ryasmeen	T261477 Conduct Reply Tool pre-deployment QA
Resolved	• matmarex	T262461 Review Reply Tool test protocol

Event Timeline

ppelberg created this task.Sep 9 2020, 6:46 PM

ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)

ppelberg mentioned this in T261477: Conduct Reply Tool pre-deployment QA.

ppelberg moved this task from Inbox to Ready to Be Worked On on the Editing-team (Kanban Board) board.

ppelberg removed a project: Editing QA.

ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)Sep 9 2020, 9:42 PM

ppelberg moved this task from Needs Prioritization to Required for Release on the OWC2020 (Reply Tool Opt Out) board.Sep 10 2020, 12:37 AM

• matmarex claimed this task.Sep 10 2020, 6:10 PM

What – if any – "Test cases" should be added to the "Template" sheet? Please add them.

I don't have any suggestions, the list you have seems to cover the common cases quite well. I was going to suggest the test cases from the last time (T252558) but I see they are already included.

A few of the test cases are a bit redundant, e.g. these all sound like the same thing to me:

Verify from the diff that, no extraneous syntax/content has been added to the comment
Verify that, no unexpected wikitext appears
Verify from the diff that, no extraneous syntax/content has been added to the comment

Which – if any – of the existing "Test cases" depend on in-progress patches? Where "depend" means a patch being merged could cause a test case to change from having Passed QA to Failing QA. Please link the tickets associated with these patches in the "Related ticket(s)" column.

The only thing I could think of is T257305: Allow multiple replies to be drafted at the same time in regard to this item:

Open and close the Reply Tool in many places on a single page and ensure the tool opens and closes properly.

But that only had an experimental patch, it's still waiting for a new design, so any changes are unlikely to happen soon.

• matmarex moved this task from Ready to Be Worked On to Ready for Sign Off on the Editing-team (Kanban Board) board.Sep 10 2020, 7:40 PM

This is great – thank you for reviewing this, @matmarex.

As @Ryasmeen and I talked about today, T261477 can now be worked on.

Restricted Application added a project: User-Ryasmeen. · View Herald TranscriptSep 11 2020, 1:06 AM

Review Reply Tool test protocolClosed, ResolvedPublicActions